CPA sample report

Inputs, rate card, and neutral tax math in one California report.

This is the report a CPA reviews. It separates the prospect's facts, the broker's rate card, the federal computation, and the California tax lines so the source of every number is visible.

USA OPS · CPA Verification Report

CPA Verification Report

Sole proprietor electing S-corporation through the PEO · California · tax year 2026 · married filing jointly

Sample / illustrative

Every figure in this report comes from one of three sources

Read this report by source. The tax computation is neutral: it applies fixed tax law to two independent sets of variables it does not choose, the prospect's facts and the broker's rate card. Change either input and the result recomputes mechanically.

Client input the prospect's facts + Broker rate card the broker's pricing Tax-law engine statute applied, no discretion*

*The engine makes exactly two disclosed modeling choices, the reasonable-wage split and a conservative QBI treatment, called out where they occur. The California state-tax lines also carry two state-specific disclosures: the tax-year basis and the entity-level franchise tax.

Source 1 · Client input

What the client entered

Net business profit$120,000
Current business structureSole proprietorSchedule C
Filing statusMarried filing jointly
Home stateCalifornia
Current health coverageFamilyindividual market
Current premium paid$2,200/mo$26,400/yr
Source 2 · Broker rate card

What the broker configured

Group medical, Plan B, family tier$2,076/mo$24,912/yr
PEO administrative fee1.5%of payroll
Reasonable-wage split60%wage / 40% distribution

The broker's full card also prices Plans A and C and the employee-only / employee+spouse / employee+children tiers. Only the selected Plan B family rate applies to this owner. The engine reads these rates as given. It does not set or adjust them.

Source 3 · Tax-law engine

Federal computation

Fixed 2026 federal tax law applied to Sources 1 and 2. Current Schedule C position vs the same owner as an S-corp inside the PEO. Each line cites its authority.

LineSole prop currentS-corp via PEOAuthority
Net business profit P$120,000$120,000Source 1
Reasonable W-2 wage BNA$72,00060% split, Source 2
S-corp distributionNA$48,000IRC section 1366
Self-employment tax$16,955NAIRC section 1401, section 1402(a)
FICA + Medicare on wageNA$11,016IRC section 3101(b), section 3111(b)
Self-employed health deduction P$26,400$26,400IRC section 162(l)(2)(A); Notice 2008-1
Section 199A QBI deduction$10,584$0IRC section 199A; see note
Standard deduction, MFJ 2026$32,200$32,200Rev. Proc. 2025-32 section 4.14
Federal taxable income$42,338$55,580IRC section 63
Federal income tax$4,585$6,174IRC section 1(j); Rev. Proc. 2025-32 section 4.01
Payroll + federal subtotal$21,540$17,190SE/FICA + federal income tax
On the section 199A line: wages are not qualified business income, so under S-corp only the K-1 distribution can generate a QBI deduction. This model also applies the conservative IRS-FAQ position that the self-employed health premium reduces QBI, a position the AICPA contests. It understates the S-corp deduction, so the benefit below is a floor, not a ceiling. California disregards section 199A entirely.
Source 3 · Tax-law engine

California state computation

California starts from federal adjusted gross income, applies its own standard deduction and rate schedule, and does not recognize the federal section 199A QBI deduction.

LineSole prop currentS-corp via PEOAuthority
California starting point, federal AGI$85,122$87,780Sch CA (540), Part I; CA conforms to 1/2 SE-tax and section 162(l)
Less California standard deduction, MFJ($11,412)($11,412)R&TC section 17073.5; FTB 2025 Form 540
Section 199A QBI not recognized by California$0$0CA has never conformed to IRC section 199A
California taxable income$73,710$76,368FTB Form 540, line 19
Tax per Schedule Y, MFJ$1,676$1,783R&TC section 17041; FTB 2025 Schedule Y
Less personal exemption credit, 2 x $153($306)($306)R&TC section 17054; FTB Form 540, line 32
California personal income tax$1,370$1,477FTB Form 540, line 64
California S-corp franchise tax, $800 minimumNA$800R&TC section 23802(b), section 23153; 1.5% of net income, $800 minimum
Total tax, payroll + federal + California personal + CA franchise$22,910$19,467
California-specific disclosures: California 2026 indexed amounts are not yet published, so this sample follows FTB 2026 Form 540-ES guidance by using the latest published 2025 schedule to estimate 2026 tax. California also taxes the S-corporation itself at 1.5% of net income with an $800 annual minimum. This sample reflects a steady-state year and includes the $800 minimum as a real cost in the S-corp column.

Annual reconciliation

Payroll tax saving, SE tax $16,955 becomes S-corp FICA $11,016+ $5,939
Federal income tax, higher under S-corp- $1,589
California personal income tax, $1,370 vs $1,477- $107
California S-corp franchise tax, $800 minimum- $800
Net income, payroll, and state tax saving+ $3,443
Group vs individual premium, $26,400 becomes $24,912+ $1,488
PEO administrative fee, 1.5% of $120,000- $1,800
Net annual benefit to the owner+ $3,131

For reference, the same profile in a no-income-tax state like Texas nets +$4,038. The $907 difference is California's $800 S-corp franchise tax plus the $107 personal-tax differential.